Competition Law and Development Policy: Subordination, Self-Sufficiency or Integration?

  • Svetiev Y
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

International competition lawyers often refer (with some pride) to the exponential growth of the number of jurisdictions in the world that have adopted antitrust enforcement regimes since the early 1990s. Namely, over 100 national jurisdictions now have some competition law mechanism and in addition, quite a few regional integration regimes contain competition provisions. Since industrialised countries have been covered by the more established and long-standing antitrust regimes in the US and the EU, much of that growth is due to the adoption of competition laws by transition and developing economies. Some of those jurisdictions have adopted or strengthened their competition enforcement regimes of their own initiative. However, more often, such a regime is implemented at the instigation or encouragement of international donors and development bodies, such as the World Bank, the IMF, as well as the EU.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Svetiev, Y. (2013). Competition Law and Development Policy: Subordination, Self-Sufficiency or Integration? In European Yearbook of International Economic Law (EYIEL), Vol. 4 (2013) (pp. 223–250). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33917-2_9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free