The war against covid-19: State of exception, state of siege, or (constitutional) emergency powers?: The italian case in comparative perspective

11Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Is the Covid-19 pandemic changing the constitutional-power structures of our democracies? Is this centennial public health emergency irreversibly constraining our liberties? The paper examines recent state-measures of containment during the initial phase of spread of the Covid-19 crisis. It compares primarily the Italian scenario with the Chinese and the American one. It asks whether the measures adopted particularly in the Italian case (known as DPCMs) amount to a state of exception or to a use of emergency powers. Cognizant of the authoritarian risks in severed enjoyments of constitutional rights, the authors conclude that this is not what occurred in the case of solid democracies. At the level of governmental analysis, the decree strategy of the Italian DPCMs allude to paternalistic forms of power-exercise that empty the self-determining prerogative of the parliament.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Corradetti, C., & Pollicino, O. (2021, September 7). The war against covid-19: State of exception, state of siege, or (constitutional) emergency powers?: The italian case in comparative perspective. German Law Journal. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2021.48

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free