Handling uncertainty in ontology construction based on Bayesian approaches: A comparative study

4Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Ontology is widely used to represent knowledge in many software applications. By default, ontology languages such as OWL and RDF is built on discrete logic, so that it can not handle uncertain information about a domain. Various approaches have been made to represent uncertainty in ontology, one of which with a Bayesian approach. Currently, there are four published approaches: BayesOWL or OntoBayes, Multi-Entity Bayesian Networks (MEBN), Probabil istic OWL (PR-OWL), and Dempster-Shafer Theory. This paper provides a comparative study on those approaches based on complexity, accuracy, ease of implementation, reasoning, and tools support. The study concluded that Baye-sOWL is the most recommended approach to handle uncertainty in ontology construction among others.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Setiawan, F. A., Wibowo, W. C., & Ginting, N. B. (2015). Handling uncertainty in ontology construction based on Bayesian approaches: A comparative study. In Communications in Computer and Information Science (Vol. 516, pp. 234–246). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46742-8_22

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free