Improving standards in brain-behavior correlation analyses

168Citations
Citations of this article
407Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Associations between two variables, for instance between brain and behavioral measurements, are often studied using correlations, and in particular Pearson correlation. However, Pearson correlation is not robust: outliers can introduce false correlations or mask existing ones. These problems are exacerbated in brain imaging by a widespread lack of control for multiple comparisons, and several issues with data interpretations. We illustrate these important problems associated with brain-behavior correlations, drawing examples from published articles. We make several propositions to alleviate these problems. © 2012 Rousselet and Pernet.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rousselet, G. A., & Pernet, C. R. (2012). Improving standards in brain-behavior correlation analyses. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, (MAY 2012). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00119

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free