Changes in malaria parasite drug resistance in an endemic population over a 25-year period with resulting genomic evidence of selection

39Citations
Citations of this article
119Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background. Analysis of genome-wide polymorphism in many organisms has potential to identify genes under recent selection. However, data on historical allele frequency changes are rarely available for direct confirmation.Methods. We genotyped single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 4 Plasmodium falciparum drug resistance genes in 668 archived parasite-positive blood samples of a Gambian population between 1984 and 2008. This covered a period before antimalarial resistance was detected locally, through subsequent failure of multiple drugs until introduction of artemisinin combination therapy. We separately performed genome-wide sequence analysis of 52 clinical isolates from 2008 to prospect for loci under recent directional selection.Results. Resistance alleles increased from very low frequencies, peaking in 2000 for chloroquine resistance-associated crt and mdr1 genes and at the end of the survey period for dhfr and dhps genes respectively associated with pyrimethamine and sulfadoxine resistance. Temporal changes fit a model incorporating likely selection coefficients over the period. Three of the drug resistance loci were in the top 4 regions under strong selection implicated by the genome-wide analysis.Conclusions. Genome-wide polymorphism analysis of an endemic population sample robustly identifies loci with detailed documentation of recent selection, demonstrating power to prospectively detect emerging drug resistance genes. © The Author 2013.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nwakanma, D. C., Duffy, C. W., Amambua-Ngwa, A., Oriero, E. C., Bojang, K. A., Pinder, M., … Conway, D. J. (2014). Changes in malaria parasite drug resistance in an endemic population over a 25-year period with resulting genomic evidence of selection. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 209(7), 1126–1135. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jit618

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free