Robust cardiac BOLD MRI using an fMRI-like approach with repeated stress paradigms

8Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: Use repeated stress paradigms and an approach taken from neurological blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) functional MRI (fMRI) to derive robust cardiac BOLD measurements. Methods: Multiple-repetition, single-shot, electrocardiographtriggered, T2-prepared BOLD balanced steady-state free precession was performed during repeated long breath-holds in 13 volunteers. Nonrigid motion correction was applied to the continuously acquired data and it was analyzed with a general linear model (GLM) taking into account the effects of the breath-hold duration, RR interval, motion, and baseline variations. Both voxel- and region of interest-based analyses were performed. Results: The GLM model was able to isolate the component of the BOLD signal arising from the breath-holds and separate it from the background effects due to the changing heart rate and motion. A significant (P < 0.05) BOLD signal increase was observed in the myocardium of healthy volunteers. Conclusion: Using a recent elastic motion correction algorithm and adapted acquisition techniques, it was possible to apply fMRI-like strategies for cardiac BOLD MRI in volunteers and derive robust BOLD measurements. The observed slight but significant oxygenation increase in the myocardium of volunteers might be explained by the vasodilator effect of increased CO2 concentration under apnea. Detection of such small physiological changes in volunteers performing breathholds demonstrates that the method could have potential in identifying low oxygenation regions in the myocardium of patients during stress tests.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stalder, A. F., Schmidt, M., Greiser, A., Speier, P., Guehring, J., Friedrich, M. G., & Mueller, E. (2015). Robust cardiac BOLD MRI using an fMRI-like approach with repeated stress paradigms. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 73(2), 577–585. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.25164

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free