Instruments for patient education: Psychometric evaluation of the expected knowledge (EKHP) and the received knowledge of hospital patients (RKHP)

6Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: In patient education, there is a need for valid and reliable instruments to assess and tailor empowering educational activities. In this study, we summarize the process of producing two parallel instruments for analyzing hospital patients’ expectations (Expected Knowledge of Hospital Patients, EKhp) and received knowledge (Received Knowledge of Hospital Patients, RKhp) and evaluate the psychometrics of the instruments based on international data. In the instruments, six elements of empowering knowledge are included (bio-physiological, functional, experiential, ethical, social, and financial). Patients and Methods: The original Finnish versions of EKhp and RKhp were tested for the first time in 2003, after which they have been used in several national studies. For international purposes, the instruments were first translated into English, then to languages of the seven participating European countries, using double-checking procedure in each one, and subsequently evaluated and confirmed by local researchers and language experts. International data collection was performed in 2009–2012 with a total sample of 1,595 orthopedic patients. Orthopedic patients were selected due to the increase in their numbers, and need for educational activities. Here we report the psychometrics of the instruments for potential international use and future development. Results: Content validities were confirmed by each participating country. Confirmatory factor analyses supported the original theoretical, six-dimensional structure of the instruments. For some subscales, however, there is a need for further clarification. The summative factors, based on the dimensions, have a satisfactory internal consistency. The results support the use of the instruments in patient education in orthopedic nursing, and preferably also in other fields of surgical nursing care. Conclusion: EKhp and RKhp have potential for international use in the evaluation of empowering patient education. In the future, testing of the structure is needed, and validation in other fields of clinical care besides surgical nursing is especially warranted.

References Powered by Scopus

Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives

78934Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Translating instruments into other languages: Development and testing processes

282Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Power and empowerment in nursing: Three theoretical approaches

210Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Gamification as an Educational Approach for Oncological Patients: A Systematic Scoping Review

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Supportive Digital Health Service During Cancer Chemotherapy: Single-Arm Before-and-After Feasibility Study

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

It's Not Just a Plaster Cast, My Leg Is in It!: Patient Experiences: A Qualitative Study

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Leino-Kilpi, H., Inkeroinen, S., Cabrera, E., Charalambous, A., Fatkulina, N., Katajisto, J., … Valkeapää, K. (2020). Instruments for patient education: Psychometric evaluation of the expected knowledge (EKHP) and the received knowledge of hospital patients (RKHP). Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 13, 1481–1505. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S271043

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

44%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

17%

Researcher 3

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 13

72%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

11%

Medicine and Dentistry 2

11%

Computer Science 1

6%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free