Is Any Job Better Than No Job? Utilising Jahoda’s Latent Deprivation Theory to Reconceptualise Underemployment

  • Beck V
  • Warren T
  • Lyonette C
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Underemployment is a widely discussed but complex concept. This article progresses discussions and provides a new sociological conceptualisation. It builds on a classic theory of unemployment, Jahoda et al.’s ‘latent deprivation theory’ (LDT), that identified five ‘latent functions’ provided by jobs, besides a wage: time structure, social relations, sense of purpose/achievement, personal identity and regular activity. LDT was ground-breaking in illuminating previously hidden injuries of joblessness. This article proposes that LDT can be similarly ground-breaking for reconceptualising underemployment: it demonstrates conceptually the multiple ways in which the mere existence of a job is insufficient in protecting individuals from socially and psychologically negative impacts associated with unemployment. A sociology of underemployment can help better understand complex, shifting and precarious work and expose inherent forms of suffering and injustice.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Beck, V., Warren, T., & Lyonette, C. (2024). Is Any Job Better Than No Job? Utilising Jahoda’s Latent Deprivation Theory to Reconceptualise Underemployment. Work, Employment and Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170241254794

Readers over time

‘24‘2505101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

64%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

18%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

9%

Researcher 1

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 6

55%

Business, Management and Accounting 3

27%

Psychology 1

9%

Mathematics 1

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0