Pathogenicity and phenotypic sulfadiazine resistance of toxoplasma gondii isolates obtained from livestock in Northeastern Brazil

23Citations
Citations of this article
57Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Toxoplasma gondii is the causative protozoan agent of toxoplasmosis, which is a common infection that is widely distributed worldwide. Studies revealed stronger clonal strains in North America and Europe and genetic diversity in South American strains. Our study aimed to differentiate the pathogenicity and sulfadiazine resistance of three T. gondii isolates obtained from livestock intended for human consumption. The cytopathic effects of the T. gondii isolates were evaluated. The pathogenicity was determined by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) using a CS3 marker and in a rodent model in vivo. Phenotypic sulfadiazine resistance was measured using a kinetic curve of drug activity in Swiss mice. IgM and IgG were measured by ELISA, and the dihydropteroate synthase (DHPS) gene sequence was analysed. The cytopathic effects and the PCR-RFLP profiles from chickens indicated a different infection source. The Ck3 isolate displayed more cytopathic effects in vitro than the Ck2 and ME49 strains. Additionally, the Ck2 isolate induced a differential humoral immune response compared to ME49. The Ck3 and Pg1 isolates, but not the Ck2 isolate, showed sulfadiazine resistance in the sensitivity assay. We did not find any DHPS gene polymorphisms in the mouse samples. These atypical pathogenicity and sulfadiazine resistance profiles were not previously reported and served as a warning to local health authorities.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Oliveira, C. B. S., Meurer, Y. S. R., Andrade, J. M. A., Costa, M. E. S. M., Andrade, M. M. C., Silva, L. A., … Andrade-Neto, V. F. (2016). Pathogenicity and phenotypic sulfadiazine resistance of toxoplasma gondii isolates obtained from livestock in Northeastern Brazil. Memorias Do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 111(6), 391–398. https://doi.org/10.1590/0074-02760150459

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free