The nature and position of processing determines why forgetting occurs in working memory tasks

22Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The effect of potentially distracting processing within working memory was examined by varying the nature and position of processing across conditions of a Brown-Peterson-like task. Separate groups of participants carried out verbal or visuospatial processing operations on identical stimuli, while retaining lists of to-beremembered words. The number of words presented either before or after the processing interval was varied systematically. Results showed that although verbal processing was no more demanding than visuospatial processing, it led to greater forgetting. However, forgetting was confined to items presented prior to processing, and the difference in degree of forgetting shown by the two groups was maximal when four items occurred before processing. Temporal isolation effects were more marked in the verbal processing group. These findings indicate that individuals can keep active a limited number of items in primary memory during processing, unless processing blocks rehearsal, in which case retrieval occurs from secondary memory. © 2010 The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jarrold, C., Tam, H., Baddeley, A. D., & Harvey, C. E. (2010). The nature and position of processing determines why forgetting occurs in working memory tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 17(6), 772–777. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.6.772

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free