Safety risk assessment of a Pb-Zn mine based on fuzzy-grey correlation analysis

32Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Improving safety management and risk evaluation methods is important for the global mining industry, which is the backbone of the industrial development of our society. To prevent any accidental loss or harm to human life and property, a safety risk assessment method is needed to perform the continuous risk assessment of mines. Based on the requirements of mine safety evaluation, this paper proposes the Pb-Zn mine safety risk evaluation model based on the fuzzy-grey correlation analysis method. The model is compared with the risk assessment model based on the fuzzy TOPSIS method. Through the experiments, our results demonstrate that the proposed fuzzy-grey correlation model is more sensitive to risk and has less effect on the evaluation results under different scoring attitudes (cautious, rational, and relaxed).

References Powered by Scopus

Fuzzy sets

71622Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Control problems of grey systems

4206Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Elementary fuzzy calculus

1203Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Fuzzy based image edge detection algorithm for blood vessel detection in retinal images

162Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Prediction of compressive strength of recycled aggregate concrete based on gray correlation analysis

76Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Real-time video stitching for mine surveillance using a hybrid image registration method

25Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dong, G., Wei, W., Xia, X., Woźniak, M., & Damaševičius, R. (2020). Safety risk assessment of a Pb-Zn mine based on fuzzy-grey correlation analysis. Electronics (Switzerland), 9(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9010130

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

46%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

23%

Researcher 3

23%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 6

55%

Computer Science 3

27%

Business, Management and Accounting 1

9%

Mathematics 1

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free