Value of Precision Medicine in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Real-World Outcomes Associated with the Use of Companion Diagnostics

  • John A
  • Shah R
  • Wong W
  • et al.
24Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

e20015Background: Five-year survival rates as low as 2.8% have been reported in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), highlighting the need for individualized diagnosis and treatment. Companion diagnostic testing (CDx) identifies patients with molecular targets likely to respond better to particular therapies; however, not all cancer patients receive CDx in the real-world setting. This study evaluated the clinical value of CDx in the real world with respect to overall survival among patients with non-squamous advanced (Stage IIIB/IV) NSCLC (aNSCLC). Methods: Patients were from the Flatiron Health electronic health-derived database, treated with systemic therapy, and diagnosed with aNSCLC between January 1, 2011 and May 31, 2018; those who received CDx with their first line of treatment were compared with those who did not. Logistic regression using components of the modified Lung Cancer Prognostic Index (LCPI; age, sex, stage, actionable mutation(s), smoking, respiratory comorbidity; Alexander et al. Br J Cancer. 2017) and other factors were used to predict characteristics associated with receiving CDx. Overall survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Unadjusted and adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to evaluate the association between CDx and overall survival. Results: A total of 17,143 patients with aNSCLC (CDx, n = 14,389; no CDx, n = 2754) and a mean (SD) age at diagnosis of 67.2 (10.0) years (CDx, 67.1 [10.1]; no CDx, 67.5 [9.2]) were included. There were more nonsmokers in the CDx group (17.4%) than the no CDx group (5.5%). Patients who were female, diagnosed after 2014, receiving multiple lines of therapy or had advanced stage at diagnosis were more likely to receive CDx. Patients receiving CDx had decreased mortality risk (unadjusted HR [95% CI] = 0.54 [0.52-0.57]) and lived longer than those not receiving CDx (median survival = 14 vs 7 months). The significant reduction in mortality associated with CDx remained after adjusting for factors included in the modified LCPI (adjusted HR [95% CI] = 0.78 [0.75-0.82]) as well as a model without actionable mutations (adjusted HR [95% CI] = 0.70 [0.66-0.73]). Conclusions: Among patients with non-squamous aNSCLC, use of CDx was associated with reduced risk of mortality compared with no CDx.

References Powered by Scopus

Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries

67163Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Using multiplexed assays of oncogenic drivers in lung cancers to select targeted drugs

1467Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

New driver mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer

1059Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Worldwide Prevalence of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

114Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Diagnostic Value and Cost-Effectiveness of Next-Generation Sequencing–Based Testing for Treatment of Patients with Advanced/Metastatic Non-Squamous Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer in the United States

38Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Association between Availability of Molecular Genotyping Results and Overall Survival in Patients with Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

29Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

John, A., Shah, R. A., Wong, W. B., Schneider, C. E., & Alexander, M. (2020). Value of Precision Medicine in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Real-World Outcomes Associated with the Use of Companion Diagnostics. The Oncologist, 25(11), e1743–e1752. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0864

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

59%

Researcher 5

29%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

6%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 10

56%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 5

28%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

11%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

6%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 47

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0