Preliminary experience with a digital robotic exoscope in cranial and spinal surgery: a review of the Synaptive Modus V system

39Citations
Citations of this article
70Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The microscope is the standard tool for microneurosurgery worldwide. However, the reduced illumination of the surgical field with the use of a conventional microscope during surgeries of deeply located pathologies remains unaddressed. Accordingly, different exoscope systems have recently been introduced in clinical practice. Here, we report our initial experience with the digital 2-dimensional Synaptive Modus V exoscope system in spinal and cranial surgery. Methods: During a 2-week period between 27 September to 11 October 2018, we used the Synaptive Modus V exoscope system and performed eight neurosurgical procedures including spine (n = 4) and cranial procedures (n = 4). Visual quality, depth perception, complications, switching to microscope comfort level of the surgeon, and learning curve during surgery were evaluated. Results: A total of eight procedures were performed, namely, vestibular schwannoma (n = 1), skull base meningioma (n = 1), olfactory groove meningioma (n = 1), tentorial meningioma (n = 1), anterior cervical discectomy (n = 1), cervical laminectomy (n = 1), and lumbar disc herniation (n = 2). The overall results were comparable to the operative microscope with better visual quality and greater comfort for the surgeon. Conclusion: The Synaptive Modus V system is a safe tool to perform common spinal surgeries and intracranial tumor resection. Image quality is better than a microscope but with slightly less depth perception. Vigorous training in the laboratory may be helpful before clinical use.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Muhammad, S., Lehecka, M., & Niemelä, M. (2019). Preliminary experience with a digital robotic exoscope in cranial and spinal surgery: a review of the Synaptive Modus V system. Acta Neurochirurgica, 161(10), 2175–2180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-019-03953-x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free