Explaining Political Regimes in Southeast Asia: A Modes of Participation Framework

3Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This chapter explains why, despite some major regime transformations including democratisation, Southeast Asian polities continue to be dominated by oligarchies and place severe limits on political participation and contestation. Using a “Modes of Participation” framework, which builds on the Murdoch School, it draws attention to the legacies of Cold War authoritarianism and state-led development in creating profoundly unequal social power relations, which are institutionalised in ways that shape and limit socio-political contestation. Nonetheless, capitalism’s dynamic, conflictual nature ensures that Southeast Asia’s oligarchs continually face challenges of political management, often manifesting as struggles over political institutions. The framework explains the outcome of these struggles, illustrated with two brief case studies from Singapore and Indonesia.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rodan, G., & Baker, J. (2020). Explaining Political Regimes in Southeast Asia: A Modes of Participation Framework. In Studies in the Political Economy of Public Policy (pp. 87–109). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28255-4_3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free