Institutions in the politics of policy change: who can play, how they play in multiple streams

13Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article explores the politics of policy change by focusing on agenda setting through the lens of the Multiple Streams Approach (MSA), which has been travelling to ever-larger geographies. We aim to produce signposts for future case studies of policy change by bringing together insights from MSA and New Institutionalism. We ask: Which institutions should we focus on when studying agenda-setting politics in different geographies? How do these institutions shape MSA's structural elements - problem stream, policy stream, political stream, policy windows, and policy entrepreneur? In answering these questions, we hope to weave not only formal but also informal institutions into MSA's backbone more tightly. We bring together diverse case studies that are sufficiently abstract and whose findings travel easily across other institutional contexts. We revisit the structural elements of MSA and illustrate how key formal and informal rules structure the politics in these structural elements.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bolukbasi, H. T., & Ylldlrlm, D. (2022). Institutions in the politics of policy change: who can play, how they play in multiple streams. Journal of Public Policy, 42(3), 509–528. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X2100026X

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free