Time of peritoneal cavity exposure influences postoperative glucose production

15Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the effect of the duration of peritoneal cavity exposure on glucose metabolism after abdominal surgery. Methods: In eight otherwise healthy patients (ASA I) with uterine myoma, endogenous glucose production (R(a) glucose) was measured immediately before and two hours after abdominal hysterectomy by a stable isotope dilution technique using primed continuous infusions of [6,6-2H2]-glucose. Plasma concentrations of glucose, lactate, insulin, glucagon, cortisol, epinephrine and norepinephrine were determined before, during (5 and 60 min after peritoneal incision, skin closure) and two hours after surgery. Pre- and postoperative glucose clearance was calculated as R glucose divided by plasma glucose concentration. Results: R(a) glucose increased from I 1.8 ± 1.2 to 16.8 ± 3.2 μmol·kg-1·min-1 two hours after hysterectomy (P < 0.05) with a correlation between the degree of increase and the time of peritoneal cavity exposure (r = 0.859, P = 0.006). Plasma glucose concentration increased after surgery from 4.7 ± 0.8 to 8.3 ± 1.9 mmol·l-1 (P < 0.05), while glucose clearance decreased from 2.6 ± 0.4 to 2.1 ± 0.4 ml·kg-1·min-1 (P < 0.05). Plasma concentrations of cortisol and catecholamines increased after hysterectomy (cortisol from 6 ± 2 to 31 ± 7 μg·dl-1, epinephrine from 25 ± 14 to 205 ± 132 pg·ml-1, norepinephrine from 182 ± 82 to 377 ± 132 pg·ml-1, P < 0.05), whereas plasma lactate, insulin and glucagon concentrations remained unchanged. Conclusion: The magnitude of increase of glucose production after abdominal hysterectomy is associated with the duration of peritoneal cavity exposure.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schricker, T., Carli, F., Schreiber, M., Laftermann, R., & Georgieff, M. (1999). Time of peritoneal cavity exposure influences postoperative glucose production. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia, 46(4), 352–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03013227

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free