Two methods for validating brain tissue classifiers

15Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In this paper, we present an evaluation of seven automatic brain tissue classifiers based on level of agreements. A number of agreement measures are explained, and we show how they can be used to compare different segmentation techniques. We use the Simultaneous Truth and Performance Level Estimation (STAPLE) of Warfield et al. but also introduce a novel evaluation technique based on the Williams' index. The methods are evaluated using these two techniques on a population of forty subjects, each having an SPGR scan and a co-registered T2 weighted scan. We provide an interpretation of the results and show how similar the output of the STAPLE analysis and Williams' index are. When no ground truth is required, we recommend the use of Williams' index as it is easy and fast to compute. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Martin-Fernandez, M., Bouix, S., Ungar, L., McCarley, R. W., & Shenton, M. E. (2005). Two methods for validating brain tissue classifiers. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 3749 LNCS, pp. 515–522). https://doi.org/10.1007/11566465_64

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free