Optimization of extraction based on the thin-layer chromatographic fingerprints of common thyme

13Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The main goal of this study was to establish the optimum accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) conditions for the isolation of the total phenolics contained in common thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.) based on the results of TLC. Additionally, two different extraction methods, i.e., Soxhlet extraction and ASE, were compared in terms of their relative performance. Binary methanol-water mixtures in different volume proportions were used as the extraction solvents. Thirteen experiments utilizing different methanol concentrations and different extraction temperatures were designed using response surface methodology. Additionally, the temperature dependence of rosmarinic and caffeic acid extraction yields was analyzed by applying HPLC. Finally, the optimum working conditions established within the framework of the assumed central composite experimental design were determined to be 27% methanol at 130°C. It was found that the extraction carried out by ASE provided higher total phenolic yields than that done in the Soxhlet apparatus. The final aim of this study was a comparison of the six different Thymus species in terms of their total phenolic content and their TLC fingerprints. It was found that the phenolic content of four species, T. pulegioides, T. kosteleckyanus, T. citriodorus, and T. marschallianus, differs from the phenolic content of T. vulgaris and T. serpyllum.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Orlowska, M., Stanimirova, I., Staszek, D., Sajewicz, M., Kowalska, T., & Waksmundzka-Hajnos, M. (2014). Optimization of extraction based on the thin-layer chromatographic fingerprints of common thyme. Journal of AOAC International, 97(5), 1274–1281. https://doi.org/10.5740/jaoacint.SGEOrlowska

Readers over time

‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘24‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

64%

Researcher 3

27%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 5

38%

Chemistry 5

38%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 2

15%

Engineering 1

8%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0