The benefits of commitment to a currency peg: Aggregate lessons from the regional effects of the 1896 u.s. presidential election

2Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

—We develop a method to use the one-time cross-sectional impact of a cleanly identified shock to identify its aggregate impact through the use of a factor model. We apply this methodology to evaluate the importance of fluctuations to the commitment to a currency peg for macroeconomic outcomes during the gold standard period in the United States. The presidential election in 1896 provides a cleanly identified positive shock to commitment to the gold standard. After the election, bank leverage increased substantially, particularly in states where gold was in greater use. Using the latent factor identified by the election, we find that full commitment to gold had the potential to reduce the volatility of real activity overall by a significant amount in the last two decades of the nineteenth century, as well as substantially mitigate the economic depression starting in 1893.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fulford, S. L., & Schwartzman, F. (2020). The benefits of commitment to a currency peg: Aggregate lessons from the regional effects of the 1896 u.s. presidential election. Review of Economics and Statistics, 102(3), 600–616. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00833

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free