Utilizing the CDIO syllabus to reveal CEAB Graduate Attribute Pathways in a Mechanical Engineering Curriculum

  • Meikleham A
  • Brennan R
  • Hugo R
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Many Canadian engineering programs offercourses through a pre-requisite approach: coursework,and therefore knowledge, is assumed to build throughout aprogram. The pre-requisite approach allows postsecondaryinstitutions to monitor the pathway a studenttakes throughout a program, and is assumed to be informedby knowledge journeys. In our experience, however, prerequisitesmay only be loosely based on scaffoldeddevelopment of student learning. Course pathwayssometimes place a greater emphasis on administrativeconvenience and historical relationships, rather thanreflect an up-to-date or meaningful developmental journey.These “pathways” appear to be particularly tenuous whenit comes to professional skills development, despite anincreasing emphasis on their importance (see Canada’sGraduate Attributes 6-12 (Canadian EngineeringAccreditation Board, 2017)). The pre-requisite model mayreinforce a bureaucratic approach to professional skillsdevelopment, inhibiting flexibility and innovation in coursedelivery by allowing administration, rather than learningoutcomes to guide student learning

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Meikleham, A., Brennan, R., & Hugo, R. J. (2018). Utilizing the CDIO syllabus to reveal CEAB Graduate Attribute Pathways in a Mechanical Engineering Curriculum. Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA). https://doi.org/10.24908/pceea.v0i0.12988

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free