Many Canadian engineering programs offercourses through a pre-requisite approach: coursework,and therefore knowledge, is assumed to build throughout aprogram. The pre-requisite approach allows postsecondaryinstitutions to monitor the pathway a studenttakes throughout a program, and is assumed to be informedby knowledge journeys. In our experience, however, prerequisitesmay only be loosely based on scaffoldeddevelopment of student learning. Course pathwayssometimes place a greater emphasis on administrativeconvenience and historical relationships, rather thanreflect an up-to-date or meaningful developmental journey.These “pathways” appear to be particularly tenuous whenit comes to professional skills development, despite anincreasing emphasis on their importance (see Canada’sGraduate Attributes 6-12 (Canadian EngineeringAccreditation Board, 2017)). The pre-requisite model mayreinforce a bureaucratic approach to professional skillsdevelopment, inhibiting flexibility and innovation in coursedelivery by allowing administration, rather than learningoutcomes to guide student learning
CITATION STYLE
Meikleham, A., Brennan, R., & Hugo, R. J. (2018). Utilizing the CDIO syllabus to reveal CEAB Graduate Attribute Pathways in a Mechanical Engineering Curriculum. Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA). https://doi.org/10.24908/pceea.v0i0.12988
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.