Pros and cons of laboratory methods used in engineering education

5Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Laboratory activities are the most critical part of an engineering education as most students learn by experimenting, observing, and writing reports. Laboratory activities are commonly implemented in curricula using several different instructional methods: the cookbook, design-based, and proposal-based. In the cookbook method, students are provided step-by-step instructions and are required to prototype, experiment, observe, and draw conclusions based on their observations. In the design-based method, students are only provided specifications and must create their own instructions to accomplish the design. In the proposal-based approach, students are required to propose an idea for a project, create their own instruction, and develop experiments to test their design. In this paper, the pros and cons of each method are discussed. To support the discussion, a survey was conducted using two sections of a design-oriented course as a means for observation. Students enrolled in this course were exposed to each method and their feedback was collected via the survey.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Habibi, M., Fearing, C., & Muslu, M. (2016). Pros and cons of laboratory methods used in engineering education. In ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2016-June). American Society for Engineering Education. https://doi.org/10.18260/p.26011

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free