Correlation between quantitative and semiquantitative parameters in DCE-MRI with a blood pool agent in rectal cancer: can semiquantitative parameters be used as a surrogate for quantitative parameters?

15Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess correlation between quantitative and semiquantitative parameters in dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) in rectal cancer patients, both in a primary staging and restaging setting. Materials and methods: Nineteen patients were included with DCE-MRI before and/or after neoadjuvant therapy. DCE-MRI was performed with gadofosveset trisodium (Ablavar®, Lantheus Medical Imaging, North Billerica, Massachusetts, USA). Regions of interest were placed in the tumor and quantitative parameters were extracted with Olea Sphere 2.2 software permeability module using the extended Tofts model. Semiquantitative parameters were calculated on a pixel-by-pixel basis. Spearman rank correlation tests were used for assessment of correlation between parameters. A p value ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Strong positive correlations were found between mean peak enhancement and mean Ktrans: 0.79 (all patients, p<0.0001), 0.83 (primary staging, p = 0.003), and 0.81 (restaging, p = 0.054). Mean wash-in correlated significantly with mean Vp and Kep (0.79 and 0.58, respectively, p<0.0001 and p = 0.009) in all patients. Mean wash-in showed a significant correlation with mean Kep (0.67, p = 0.033) in the primary staging group. On the restaging MRI, mean wash-in only strongly correlated with mean Vp (0.81, p = 0.054). Conclusion: This study shows a strong correlation between quantitative and semiquantitative parameters in DCE-MRI for rectal cancer. Peak enhancement correlates strongly with Ktrans and wash-in showed strong correlation with Vp and Kep. These parameters have been reported to predict tumor aggressiveness and response in rectal cancer. Therefore, semiquantitative analyses might be a surrogate for quantitative analyses.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dijkhoff, R. A. P., Maas, M., Martens, M. H., Papanikolaou, N., Lambregts, D. M. J., Beets, G. L., & Beets-Tan, R. G. H. (2017). Correlation between quantitative and semiquantitative parameters in DCE-MRI with a blood pool agent in rectal cancer: can semiquantitative parameters be used as a surrogate for quantitative parameters? Abdominal Radiology, 42(5), 1342–1349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-1024-0

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free