Profiling the impact of the promoters on CRISPR-Cas12a system in human cells

3Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The plasmid vector platform is the most commonly used vector for the expression of the versatile CRISPR-Cas technique and the promoter is a crucial element for the expression vector, thus profiling the impact of the promoters on CRISPR editors provides the basic information for the gene-editing toolkits and can be a guideline for its design. Herein, we made a parallel comparison among four commonly used promoters (CAG, ~ 1700 bp; EF1a core, ~ 210 bp; CMV, ~ 500 bp; and PGK, ~ 500 bp) in CRISPR-Cas12a system in mammalian cells to explore the impact of promoters on this powerful tool. We found that without badly damaging targeting specificity, the CAG promoter-driving Cas12a editor exhibited the most active (efficiency takes as 100%, specificity index = ~ 75%) in genomic cleavage, multiplex editing, transcriptional activation, and base editing, followed by promoter CMV (efficiency = 70 ~ 90% (vs CAG), specificity index = ~ 78%), and then EF1a core and PGK (both efficiency = 40–60%, vs CAG) but with higher specificity (specificity index = ~ 84% and ~ 82%, respectively). Therefore, CAG is recommended in the CRISPR-Cas12a system for the applications that need a robust editing activity but without size limitation, CMV mostly can be an alternative for CAG when requiring a smaller space, EF1a is similar to PGK with relatively high specificity, but has a smaller size, thus is more suitable for in vivo therapeutic applications. The data outlined the properties of the widely used promoters in the CRISPR-Cas12a system, which can be a guide for its applications and can be a useful resource for the gene-editing field.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Li, J., Liang, Q., Zhou, H. P., Zhou, M., & Huang, H. (2023). Profiling the impact of the promoters on CRISPR-Cas12a system in human cells. Cellular and Molecular Biology Letters, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s11658-023-00454-9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free