Analysing differences between business process similarity measures

13Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Nowadays, it is not uncommon that organisations maintain repositories containing hundreds or thousands of business process models. For the purpose of searching such a repository for models that are similar to a query model, many similarity measures have been suggested in the literature. Other measures have been suggested for different purposes like measuring compliance between a model and a reference model. As those similarity measures differ in many aspects, it is an interesting question how they rank "similarity" within the same set of process models. In our study, we investigated, how different kinds of changes in a process model influence the values of 22 different similarity measures that have been published in academic literature. Furthermore, we identified eight properties that a similarity measure should have from a theoretical point of view and analysed how these properties are fulfilled by the different measures. Our results show that there are remarkable differences among existing measures. We give some recommendations which kind of measure is useful for which kind of application. © 2012 Springer-Verlag.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Becker, M., & Laue, R. (2012). Analysing differences between business process similarity measures. In Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing (Vol. 100 LNBIP, pp. 39–49). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28115-0_5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free