Consequentialism and Its Variants

  • Mukerji N
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

After Chap. 3 introduced the Family Resemblance Approach to criticizing consequentialism, this chapter completes its first three steps. The first step consists in examining a paradigmatic consequentialist moral theory, viz. Classic Utilitarianism. It is factorized into a set of logical components. The second step aims to exploit a methodological shortcut that is part of the Family Resemblance Approach. This shortcut consists in showing that some distinctions between consequentialist theories are irrelevant, given the methodological commitments made in Chap. 2 . These versions are eliminated from the subsequent discussion. The third step examines non-paradigmatic versions of consequentialism that need to be examined to make a comprehensive case against the whole family of consequentialist theories.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mukerji, N. (2016). Consequentialism and Its Variants (pp. 87–180). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39249-3_4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free