Artificial sphincters

0Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Surgical treatment of female urinary incontinence has progressed considerably in the past 20 years and most patients who qualify for treatment will not require an artificial urinary sphincter (AUS). While in males it is the procedure of choice for post-radical prostatectomy stress incontinence [1], in females controversy exists regarding the indications as many patients, even those with severe incontinence following multiple surgeries, can be managed successfully with surgery that does not involve implantation of a mechanical prosthesis. However, it does have a place and this chapter will outline the historical aspects, clinical evaluation and indications, the surgical procedure, results and complications of its use in females. © 2006 Springer-Verlag London Limited.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Herschorn, S., & Jolivet-Tremblay, M. (2006). Artificial sphincters. In Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery (pp. 369–378). Springer London. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-238-1_34

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free