Investigation of Blood and Urine Malondialdehyde Levels in Mice Exposed to Silica Dust

  • Gholami A
  • Golbabaei F
  • Teimori G
  • et al.
1Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

© 2019 Gholami et al. Background and Objectives: Occupational exposure to silica dust can lead to biochemical damage. Malondialdehyde (MDA) can be considered as a primary marker for measuring the level of oxidative stress in a living organism. This study was conducted in order to evaluate the level of MDA in blood and urine of mice exposed to silica dust. Material and Methods: In this experimental study, 72 mice (BALB/c) were randomly allocated to five exposed groups and 1 control group. Exposure of mice to pure 99% silica dust was done in closed containers. Blood sampling was performed from the heart of mice and urine sampling fulfilled by insertion into a metabolic cage. The RAO et al. method was used to measure MDA. Results: The highest level of plasma MDA in group 1 in the 4th month was 8.4±0.41 nmol/l and the lowest level of MDA was 1.3±0.2 nmol/l in the third sampling in the control group, also the highest amount of urine MDA in the first and second groups and 4 months after exposure was 1.16±0.51 nmol/l, and the lowest in the control group and in the third sampling was 0.48±0.06 nmol/l. A significant difference was found between the levels of MDA in all exposed groups at different times except for the 5th group with the lowest concentration (P < 0.05). Conclusion: MDA in blood and urine could be proposed as a good biomarker for the evaluation of biochemical damages caused by silica dust. Measuring MDA is also a simple and inexpensive method that does not require complex equipment and can be used as an early detection test for biochemical damages caused by silica.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gholami, A., Golbabaei, F., Teimori, G., Kianmehr, M., & Yaseri, M. (2019). Investigation of Blood and Urine Malondialdehyde Levels in Mice Exposed to Silica Dust. The Open Biochemistry Journal, 13(1), 32–36. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874091x01913010032

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free