Constraints of difference and equality: A complete taxonomic characterisation

4Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Many combinatorial problems encountered in practice involve constraints that require that a set of variables take distinct or equal values. The AllDifferent constraint, in particular, ensures that all variables take distinct values. Two soft variants of this constraint were proposed in [4], defined either with respect to a so-called variable or graph-based cost function. When requiring similarity, as opposed to diversity, one can consider the dual definition either for the cost or for the basic constraint itself, that is, AllEqual in our case. Six cost functions can be defined by exploring every combination of these definitions. It is therefore natural to study the complexity of achieving arc consistency and bounds consistency on them. From our earlier work on this topic an open problem remained, namely achieving bounds consistency on the maximisation of the SoftAllDiff constraint when considering the graph-based cost. In this paper we resolve this problem. Therefore, we give a complete taxonomy of constraints of equality and difference, based on the alternative objective functions used for the soft variants. © 2009 Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hebrard, E., Marx, D., O’Sullivan, B., & Razgon, I. (2009). Constraints of difference and equality: A complete taxonomic characterisation. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 5732 LNCS, pp. 424–438). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04244-7_35

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free