Practitioners' Expectations on Automated Code Comment Generation

27Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Good comments are invaluable assets to software projects, as they help developers understand and maintain projects. However, due to some poor commenting practices, comments are often missing or inconsistent with the source code. Software engineering practitioners often spend a significant amount of time and effort reading and understanding programs without or with poor comments. To counter this, researchers have proposed various techniques to au-tomatically generate code comments in recent years, which can not only save developers time writing comments but also help them better understand existing software projects. However, it is unclear whether these techniques can alleviate comment issues and whether practitioners appreciate this line of research. To fill this gap, we performed an empirical study by interviewing and surveying practitioners about their expectations of research in code comment generation. We then compared what practitioners need and the current state-of-the-art research by performing a literature review of papers on code comment generation techniques pub-lished in the premier publication venues from 2010 to 2020. From this comparison, we highlighted the directions where researchers need to put effort to develop comment generation techniques that matter to practitioners.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hu, X., Xia, X., Lo, D., Wan, Z., Chen, Q., & Zimmermann, T. (2022). Practitioners’ Expectations on Automated Code Comment Generation. In Proceedings - International Conference on Software Engineering (Vol. 2022-May, pp. 1693–1705). IEEE Computer Society. https://doi.org/10.1145/3510003.3510152

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free