Propensity for adverse pregnancy outcomes in African-American women may be explained by low energy expenditure in early pregnancy

9Citations
Citations of this article
116Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background African-American (AA) women have poorer pregnancy outcomes, and studies in nonpregnant women suggest a different etiology of weight gain in AA compared with white women. We hypothesized that physiologic factors such as low energy expenditure and physical activity would be present in AA compared with white women in pregnancy. Objective We aimed to identify physiologic risk factors for disordered energy balance in AA and white women early in pregnancy. Design This was a cross-sectional study in 66 pregnant women with obesity, between 14 and 16 wk of gestation. Energy intake was calculated using the intake-balance method. Energy expenditure was measured in free-living conditions [total daily energy expenditure (TDEE)] over 7 d with the use of doubly labelled water and during sleep [sleeping EE (SleepEE)] in a room calorimeter. Body composition was measured by air displacement plethysmography and physical activity by accelerometers. Markers of metabolic health were obtained from fasting blood and urine. Results AA (n = 34) and white (n = 32) women were comparable in age (mean ± SEM: 27.7 ± 0.6 y), enrollment body mass index [mean ± SEM (in kg/m 2): 36.9 ± 0.7], and body fat (mean ± SEM: 45.0% ± 0.6%). AA women had more fat-free mass (P = 0.01) and tended to be more insulin-resistant (homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance, P = 0.06). Energy intake was significantly lower in AA than in white women (2499 ± 76 compared with 2769 ± 58 kcal/d, P = 0.001), although absolute TDEE was comparable (AA: 2590 ± 77 kcal/d; white: 2711 ± 56 kcal/d; P = 0.21). After adjusting for body composition, TDEE was significantly lower in AA women (-231 ± 74 kcal/d, P = 0.003), as was SleepEE (-81 ± 37 kcal/d, P = 0.03). Physical activity, substrate oxidation, and metabolic biomarkers (triiodothyronine and thyroxine concentrations, catecholamine excretion) were not significantly different between groups. Conclusions Body mass-adjusted energy expenditure is significantly lower in AA than in white pregnant women. Energy intake recommendations for pregnancy do not consider this difference and may therefore overestimate energy requirements in AA women. This may lead to unintentional overeating and contribute to the disparity of excess gestational weight gain and postpartum weight retention that is more prevalent in AA women.

References Powered by Scopus

New methods for calculating metabolic rate with special reference to protein metabolism

4345Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Trends in obesity among adults in the United States, 2005 to 2014

2363Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Reduced Rate of Energy Expenditure as a Risk Factor for Body-Weight Gain

1066Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Energy intake requirements in pregnancy

111Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Contributions of ‘Diet’ ‘Genes’ and Physical Activity to the Etiology of Obesity: Contrary Evidence and Consilience

61Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy

0
47Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Most, J., Gilmore, L. A., Altazan, A. D., St Amant, M., Beyl, R. A., Ravussin, E., & Redman, L. M. (2018). Propensity for adverse pregnancy outcomes in African-American women may be explained by low energy expenditure in early pregnancy. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 107(6), 957–964. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqy053

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 40

80%

Researcher 5

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

6%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 18

41%

Nursing and Health Professions 13

30%

Sports and Recreations 7

16%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free