The prevalence of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in men and women with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

105Citations
Citations of this article
162Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: Type 2 diabetes is a risk factor for the development of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Our aim was to provide a summary estimate of the prevalence of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in type 2 diabetes patients and to investigate sex disparities. Methods and results: A systematic search of the databases Medline and Embase was conducted for studies reporting the prevalence of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction or heart failure with preserved ejection fraction among type 2 diabetes patients. Studies were only included if echocardiography was performed. Prevalence estimates were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. A total of 28 studies were included. Data on the prevalence of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction were available in 27 studies. The pooled prevalence for left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in the hospital population (2959 type 2 diabetes participants) and in the general population (2813 type 2 diabetes participants) was 48% [95% confidence interval: 38%–59%] and 35% (95% confidence interval: 24%–46%), respectively. Heterogeneity was high in both populations, with estimates ranging from 19% to 81% in the hospital population and from 23% to 54% in the general population. For women and men, the pooled prevalence estimates of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction were 47% (95% confidence interval: 37%–58%) and 46% (95% confidence interval: 37%–55%), respectively. Only two studies presented the prevalence of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; 8% (95% confidence interval: 5%–14%) in a hospital population and 25% (95% confidence interval: 21%–28%) in the general population [18% in men (mean age: 73.8; standard deviation: 8.6) and 28% in women (mean age: 74.9; standard deviation: 6.9)]. Conclusion: The prevalence of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction among type 2 diabetes patients is similarly high in men and women, while heart failure with preserved ejection fraction seems to be more common in women than men, at least in community people with type 2 diabetes.

References Powered by Scopus

Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test

42933Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis

27052Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias

14060Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Mechanisms of diabetic cardiomyopathy and potential therapeutic strategies: preclinical and clinical evidence

504Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

From NASH to diabetes and from diabetes to NASH: Mechanisms and treatment options

294Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Characterization of the inflammatory-metabolic phenotype of heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction: a hypothesis to explain influence of sex on the evolution and potential treatment of the disease

117Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bouthoorn, S., Valstar, G. B., Gohar, A., den Ruijter, H. M., Reitsma, H. B., Hoes, A. W., & Rutten, F. H. (2018, November 1). The prevalence of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in men and women with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes and Vascular Disease Research. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1177/1479164118787415

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 49

73%

Researcher 11

16%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

7%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 59

83%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 7

10%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 3

4%

Materials Science 2

3%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free