Speaker sex identification utilizing a constant laryngeal source

13Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

It has been demonstrated that the sex of speakers can be reliably and accurately identified in the absence of idiosyncratic glottal wave forms. This finding led to the hypothesis that there are other sex-related differences in the supraglottal vocal tract which produce discriminable acoustic differences in the speech signal. As a test of this hypothesis, six males and six females counted to ten and read the second sentence of the 'Rainbow Passage', with a closed glottis, while using an electronic artificial larynx (fundamental frequency 120 Hz). The vocalizations were tape-recorded, randomized and played to 30 listeners who were asked to determine the speakers' sex. Later, the vocalizations were subjected to a sound spectrum analysis. Results indicated that male voices with speech spectra shifted toward the lower frequencies were identified above chance as were female voices with speech spectra shifted toward the higher frequencies. Speakers, whose energy concentrations were centralized, were most often confused. These results confirm the hypothesis that sex-related supraglottal vocal tract characteristics (potentially vocal tract size and shape) can play a major role in the identification of a speaker's sex.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Gender recognition from speech. Part II: Fine analysis

202Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Acoustic correlates of perceived versus actual sexual orientation in men's speech

123Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Speech characteristics of male-to-female transsexuals: A perceptual and acoustic study

90Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brown, W. S., & Feinstein, S. H. (1977). Speaker sex identification utilizing a constant laryngeal source. Folia Phoniatrica, 29(3), 240–248. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2001836

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

50%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

25%

Researcher 1

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 1

25%

Physics and Astronomy 1

25%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

25%

Medicine and Dentistry 1

25%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free