Effect of bevacizumab in older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: Pooled analysis of four randomized studies

141Citations
Citations of this article
71Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background Bevacizumab is frequently combined with 5-Xuorouracil-based chemotherapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The relative beneffit of bevacizumab in older patients has not been widely studied and is of interest. Patients and methods This retrospective analysis used data from three first-line randomized controlled studies and one second-line randomized controlled study of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in medically Wt (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1) patients with mCRC. Overall survival (OS) and on-treatment progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed in patients aged <65, ≥65, and ≥70 years. Results were compared using unstratiWed hazard ratios (HRs). Grade 3-5 adverse events were also assessed. Results Bevacizumab statistically signiWcantly improved PFS [HR 0.58; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.49-0.68] and OS (HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.74-0.97) in patients aged ≥65 years; patients aged ≥70 years had similar improvements. BeneWts were consistent across the studies, irrespective of setting, bevacizumab dose, or chemotherapy regimen. Increases in thromboembolic events were observed in patients aged ≥65 and ≥70 years in the bevacizumab group compared with the control group, mainly as a result of increases in arterial thromboembolic events. No other substantial age-related increases in grade 3-5 adverse events were observed. Conclusions In medically Wt older patients, bevacizumab provides similar PFS and OS beneWts as in younger patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cassidy, J., Saltz, L. B., Giantonio, B. J., Kabbinavar, F. F., Hurwitz, H. I., & Rohr, U. P. (2010). Effect of bevacizumab in older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: Pooled analysis of four randomized studies. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 136(5), 737–743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-009-0712-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free