Interference testing: Why following standards is not always the right thing to do

2Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Lucarelli and colleagues in this issue of Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology describe the results of interference testing for a continuous glucose monitoring system. The authors follow the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute guideline EP7-A2, including their conclusions, in which the concepts of a statistically significant interfering substance and a clinically important interference have been combined in a way whereby information from the experiment has been lost and could be misleading. A better way to treat the data is presented, including a simulation method to evaluate the effects of interferences. © Diabetes Technology Society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Krouwer, J. S. (2012). Interference testing: Why following standards is not always the right thing to do. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 6(5), 1182–1184. https://doi.org/10.1177/193229681200600523

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free