Angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia should not be confused with Kimura's disease

60Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: To emphasize the differences between angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia (ALHE) and Kimura's disease (KD), two entities often confused in the ophthalmic literature. Methods: Case report of a subcutaneous mass in the periocular region of a 45-year old woman and a MEDLINE review of the ophthalmic and non-ophthalmic literature on ALHE and KD. Results: The clinical and histopathological findings of the present case were consistent with ALHE, but not with KD. A survey of the current ophthalmic literature indicates that these two designations are still often used synonymously, despite that non-ophthalmic papers now separate ALHE from KD. Conclusion: The clinical and histopathological features of ALHE are most often distinctly different from KD and these entities should be clearly separated in the ophthalmic literature.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Seregard, S. (2001). Angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia should not be confused with Kimura’s disease. Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica, 79(1), 91–93. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0420.2001.079001091.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free