Cardiometabolic Risk Factors and Incident Cardiovascular Disease Events in Women vs Men with Type 1 Diabetes

19Citations
Citations of this article
57Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Importance: The lower risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) among women compared with men in the general population may be diminished among those with diabetes. Objective: To evaluate cardiometabolic risk factors and their management in association with CVD events in women vs men with type 1 diabetes enrolled in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (DCCT/EDIC) study. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used data obtained during the combined DCCT (randomized clinical trial, conducted 1983-1993) and EDIC (observational study, conducted 1994 to present) studies through April 30, 2018 (mean [SD] follow-up, 28.8 [5.8] years), at 27 clinical centers in the US and Canada. Data analyses were performed between July 2021 and April 2022. Exposure: During the DCCT phase, patients were randomized to intensive vs conventional diabetes therapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: Cardiometabolic risk factors and CVD events were assessed via detailed medical history and focused physical examinations. Blood and urine samples were assayed centrally. CVD events were adjudicated by a review committee. Linear mixed models and Cox proportional hazards models evaluated sex differences in cardiometabolic risk factors and CVD risk over follow-up. Results: A total of 1441 participants with type 1 diabetes (mean [SD] age at DCCT baseline, 26.8 [7.1] years; 761 [52.8%] men; 1390 [96.5%] non-Hispanic White) were included. Over the duration of the study, compared with men, women had significantly lower body mass index (BMI, calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared; β = -0.43 [SE, 0.16]; P =.006), waist circumference (β = -10.56 cm [SE, 0.52 cm]; P <130/80 mm Hg: 90.0% vs 77.4%; P <150 mg/dL: 97.3% vs 90.5%; P <7%: 11.2% [95% CI, 9.3%-13.3%] vs 14.0% [95% CI, 12.0%-16.3%]; P =.03). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that despite a more favorable cardiometabolic risk factor profile, women with type 1 diabetes did not have a significantly lower CVD event burden than men, suggesting a greater clinical impact of cardiometabolic risk factors in women vs men with diabetes. These findings call for conscientious optimization of the control of CVD risk factors in women with type 1 diabetes..

References Powered by Scopus

Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge.

27798Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2022 Update: A Report from the American Heart Association

3766Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

2013 AHA/ACC/TOS guideline for the management of overweight and obesity in adults: A report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on practice guidelines and the obesity society

1748Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Lipid-lowering therapies and cardiovascular risk-stratification strategies in adults with type 1 diabetes

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Sex differences in associations between creatinine and cystatin C-based kidney function measures with stroke and major bleeding

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Endogenous estradiol contributes to vascular endothelial dysfunction in premenopausal women with type 1 diabetes

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Braffett, B. H., Bebu, I., El Ghormli, L., Cowie, C. C., Sivitz, W. I., Pop-Busui, R., … Dagogo-Jack, S. (2022). Cardiometabolic Risk Factors and Incident Cardiovascular Disease Events in Women vs Men with Type 1 Diabetes. JAMA Network Open, 5(9), E2230710. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.30710

Readers over time

‘22‘23‘24‘2507142128

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 11

79%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

14%

Researcher 1

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 7

47%

Nursing and Health Professions 6

40%

Chemical Engineering 1

7%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

7%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 2
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 28

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0