A randomised controlled trial of ultrasound-assisted spinal anaesthesia

34Citations
Citations of this article
70Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Pre-procedural ultrasound scanning has been used to facilitate spinal anaesthesia in patients with difficult anatomical landmarks and shown to improve first-attempt success rates in some studies. We studied whether pre-procedural ultrasound scanning improved first-attempt success rate and decreased time taken for the procedure in the general adult population. In this prospective, randomised controlled trial, 170 American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1 to 3 patients aged between 21 and 80 years were recruited. Informed consent was obtained. Patients were randomised into two groups, ultrasound-guided identification of landmarks (Ultrasound Group) and manual palpation of landmarks (Manual Palpation Group). The primary outcome was first-attempt success rate and secondary outcomes were time taken to perform procedure, number of needle redirections, patient satisfaction and complications. The first-attempt success rate was 64% in the Ultrasound Group and 52% in the Manual Palpation Group (P=0.16). Time taken for procedure was shorter in the Ultrasound Group compared to the Manual Palpation Group (2.9±3.6 minutes versus 3.9±3.7 minutes, P= 0.007). Patient satisfaction was higher in the Ultrasound Group. There were no differences in complications. As there was no statistically significant difference in first-attempt success rates between the two groups, existing evidence for routine pre-procedural scanning for all patients is inadequate. The current use of pre-procedural ultrasound scanning will probably be limited to selected patients where spinal anaesthesia may be technically challenging with conventional methods.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lim, Y. C., Choo, C. Y., & Tan, K. T. J. (2014). A randomised controlled trial of ultrasound-assisted spinal anaesthesia. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, 42(2), 191–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057x1404200205

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free