Is the schedule clause really necessary in OpenMP?

26Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Choosing the appropriate assignment of loop iterations to threads is one of the most important decisions that need to be taken when parallelizing Loops, the main source of parallelism in numerical applications. This is not an easy task, even for expert programmers, and it can potentially take a large amount of time. OpenMP offers the schedule clause, with a set of predefined iteration scheduling strategies, to specify how (and when) this assignment of iterations to threads is done. In some cases, the best schedule depends on architectural characteristics of the target architecture, data input, ... making the code less portable. Even worse, the best schedule can change along execution time depending on dynamic changes in the behavior of the loop or changes in the resources available in the system. Also, for certain types of imbalanced loops, the schedulers already proposed in the literature are not able to extract the maximum parallelism because they do not appropriately trade-off load balancing and data locality. This paper proposes a new scheduling strategy, that derives at run time the best scheduling policy for each parallel loop in the program, based on information gathered at runtime by the library itself. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ayguadé, E., Blainey, B., Duran, A., Labarta, J., Martínez, F., Martorell, X., & Silvera, R. (2003). Is the schedule clause really necessary in OpenMP? Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 2716, 147–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45009-2_12

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free