Comparison of deep learning libraries on the problem of handwritten digit classification

7Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative analysis of several popular and freely available deep learning frameworks. We compare functionality and usability of the frameworks trying to solve popular computer vision problems like hand-written digit recognition. Four libraries have been chosen for the detailed study: Caffe, Pylearn2, Torch, and Theano. We give a brief description of these libraries, consider key features and capabilities, and provide case studies. We also investigate the performance of the libraries. This study allows making a decision which deep learning framework suites us best and will be used for our future research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kruchinin, D., Dolotov, E., Kornyakov, K., Kustikova, V., & Druzhkov, P. (2015). Comparison of deep learning libraries on the problem of handwritten digit classification. In Communications in Computer and Information Science (Vol. 542, pp. 399–411). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26123-2_38

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free