High Reliability Knowledge Networks: Responding to Animal Diseases in a Pastoral Area of Northern Kenya

10Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

How can reliability be generated and sustained in the face of uncertainty? This question is explored by examining knowledge networks among pastoralists and others in northern Kenya, emerging in response to a highly variable animal disease setting. Using quantitative and qualitative social network analysis, intersecting locally-embedded, development project and political networks are identified. Drawing on high-reliability theory, as applied to critical infrastructures, the paper explores the key characteristics of the knowledge networks in relation to systems, knowledges, relationships, technologies, professionals and politics. Reliability–the ability to provide stable services and respond variability in real-time–is shown to be related to the networked capacity to mobilise knowledge to confront uncertainty and avoid ignorance, with certain high-reliability professionals central. The locally-embedded network in particular has important characteristics of a high reliability knowledge network, but key brokers link to the development project and political network. Development challenges often require addressing uncertainty and even ignorance and lessons from high-reliability approaches can be crucial.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Confronting Uncertainties in Pastoral Areas Transforming Development from Control to Care

13Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

This article is free to access.

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tasker, A., & Scoones, I. (2022). High Reliability Knowledge Networks: Responding to Animal Diseases in a Pastoral Area of Northern Kenya. Journal of Development Studies, 58(5), 968–988. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2021.2013469

Readers over time

‘22‘23‘240481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

69%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

15%

Researcher 2

15%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6

40%

Social Sciences 5

33%

Medicine and Dentistry 2

13%

Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medic... 2

13%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 3
News Mentions: 21

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0