Analysis of human cytomegalovirus replication in primary cultured human corneal endothelial cells

23Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background/aims Since the first case of human cytomegalovirus (HCMV)-induced corneal endotheliitis in which HCMV DNA was detected from the patient's aqueous humour using PCR, the clinical evidence for HCMV endotheliitis has been accumulating. However, it remains to be confirmed whether HCMV can efficiently replicate in corneal endothelial cells. We, therefore, sought to determine whether primary cultured human corneal endothelial cells (HCECs) could support HCMV replication. Methods Human foreskin fibroblasts (HFFs) have been shown to be fully permissive for HCMV replication, and are commonly used as an in vitro model for HCMV lytic replication. Therefore, primary cultured HCECs or HFFs were infected with the vascular endotheliotropic HCMV strain TB40/E or laboratory strain Towne. We then compared viral mRNA and protein expression, genome replication and growth between the TB40/E-infected and Towne-infected HCECs and HFFs. Results When HCECs were infected with TB40/E or Towne, rounded cells resembling owl's eyes as well as viral antigens were detected. Viral mRNA synthesis and protein expression proceeded efficiently in the HCECs and HFFs infected with TB40/E or Towne at a high multiplicity of infection (MOI). Similarly, the viral genome was also effectively replicated, with UL44-a viral DNA polymerase processivity factor-foci observed in the nuclei of HCECs. HCECs produced a substantial number of infectious virions after infection with TB40/E at both a high and low MOI. Conclusions Primary cultured HCECs could efficiently support HCMV replication after infection at both a high and low MOI.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hosogai, M., Shima, N., Nakatani, Y., Inoue, T., Iso, T., Yokoo, H., … Isomura, H. (2015). Analysis of human cytomegalovirus replication in primary cultured human corneal endothelial cells. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 99(11), 1583–1590. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-306486

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free