Human detection of drone invasion in a low-altitude airspace: An application of signal detection theory

3Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A field study was conducted to investigate the sensitivity of human participants in detecting the invasion of a drone in the airspace. A Phantom 4 quadcopter was remotely controlled to hovering at air locations inside or outside of a stadium. Twenty participants were requested to determine whether the drone has invaded in the test field or not on a five-point scale. The participants also responded whether they have heard the sound of the drone. The nonparametric measures of the sensitivity of drone invasion detection, or P(A), were calculated. The results indicated that the distance between the drone and the boundary of the airspace significantly affected the P(A) while the effects of drone altitude were not significant. The participants were not unbiased detectors. They tended to respond “probably yes,” in general, when they spotted a drone near the airspace. The hearing of the sound of the drone provided partial cues in drone invasion detection.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Li, K. W., Peng, L., & Zhao, C. (2019). Human detection of drone invasion in a low-altitude airspace: An application of signal detection theory. Human Factors and Ergonomics In Manufacturing, 29(1), 78–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20759

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free