Evaluation of Biolog for identification of members of the family Micrococcaceae

27Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The Biolog Identification System (Biolog, Inc., Hayward, Calif.) was challenged at two separate laboratories with 113 coded isolates, including 33 type strains of staphylococci, 5 strains of Micrococcus spp., and 1 strain of Stomatococcus mucilaginosus. Test parameters between the sites were controlled as much as possible. Discrepancies were arbitrated by using conventional biochemicals. Overall accuracies (correct to the species level) upon initial testing were 47.7 and 59.3%, respectively, at the two laboratories. After repeat testing of isolates generating 'no identification' responses or errors, the overall accuracies increased to 69.0 and 74.3% at the two sites, respectively, revealing no significant difference in the final results at the two laboratories (78 of 113 versus 84 of 113; P > 0.05). Error rates were 7.1% at one site and 9.7% at the other. The Biolog is not yet accurate enough to serve as a primary method for identifying staphylococci.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Miller, J. M., Biddle, J. W., Quenzer, V. K., & McLaughlin, J. C. (1993). Evaluation of Biolog for identification of members of the family Micrococcaceae. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 31(12), 3170–3173. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.31.12.3170-3173.1993

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free