Afterword Moving The Methodology of Self-Study Research and Practice Forward: Challenges and Opportunities

  • LaBoskey V
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This chapter serves as an afterword for this section of the handbook devoted to be articulation and examination of the methods and methodology of self-study research and practice. I compare and contrast sections 8 chapters and conclude that there is significant and corroborative consistency in the conceptual framework for and methodology of self-study. The differences that are revealed are mainly in the details and suggest promising avenues for future deliberation and development. I propose and encourage four possible foci for our efforts to move the methodology of self-study research and practice forward: the role of the subject matter of teacher education in our self-study methodology; the differences and relationship between the methods and methodology of self-study; the further articulation and application of the validation process defined as trustworthiness; and, our grounding in and goals for the ethic of care and social justice in our self-study practice and research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

LaBoskey, V. K. (2004). Afterword Moving The Methodology of Self-Study Research and Practice Forward: Challenges and Opportunities. In International Handbook of Self-Study of Teaching and Teacher Education Practices (pp. 1169–1184). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6545-3_29

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free