Disentangling the Effects of Risk Factors and Clinical Care on Subnational Variation in Early Neonatal Mortality in the United States

7Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: Between 1990 and 2010, the U.S ranking in neonatal mortality slipped from 29th to 45th among countries globally. Substantial subnational variation in newborn mortality also exists. Our objective is to measure the extent to which trends and subnational variation in early neonatal mortality reflect differences in the prevalence of risk factors (gestational age and birth weight) compared to differences in clinical care. Methods: Observational study using linked birth and death data for all births in the United States between 1996 and 2006. We examined health service area (HSA) level variation in the expected early neonatal mortality rate, based on gestational age (GA) and birth-weight (BW), and GA-BW adjusted mortality as a proxy for clinical care. We analyzed the relationship between selected health system indicators and GA-BW-adjusted mortality. Results: The early neonatal death (ENND) rate declined 12% between 1996 and 2006 (2.39 to 2.10 per 1000 live births). This occurred despite increases in risk factor prevalence. There was significant HSA-level variation in the expected ENND rate (Rate Ratio: 0.73-1.47) and the GA-BW adjusted rate (Rate ratio: 0.63-1.68). Accounting for preterm volume (defined as <34 weeks), the number of neonatologist and NICU beds, 25.2% and 58.7% of the HSA-level variance in outcomes was explained among all births and very low birth weight babies, respectively. Conclusion: Improvements in mortality could be realized through the expansion or reallocation of clinical neonatal resources, particularly in HSAs with a high volume of preterm births; however, prevention of preterm births and low-birth weight babies has a greater potential to improve newborn survival in the United States. © 2012 Straney et al.

Figures

  • Table 1. Health Service Area (HSA) covariates.
  • Table 2. First-stage GA-BW adjustment model for Early Neonatal Deaths among US births (1996–2006).
  • Figure 1. Expected and Observed ENND rate 1996–2006.
  • Figure 2. Ratio of the expected early neonatal mortality rate compared to national average by HSA, 2004–2006.
  • Figure 3. Ratio of the GA-BW adjusted early neonatal mortality rate compared to national average by HSA, 2004–2006.
  • Table 3. Univarite relationship between HSA-level covariates and GA-BW adjusted early neonatal mortality (2004–2006).
  • Table 3. Cont.
  • Table 4. Variance in GA-BW adjusted ENN mortality explained by HSA covariates (2004–2006).

References Powered by Scopus

The fetal and infant origins of adult disease

1938Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Birth spacing and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes: A meta-analysis

904Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Antiplatelet agents for preventing pre-eclampsia and its complications

746Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Effective Coverage: A Metric for Monitoring Universal Health Coverage

137Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Kidney transplant access in the Southeast: View from the bottom

37Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Use of telemedicine to improve neonatal resuscitation

31Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Straney, L. D., Lim, S. S., & Murray, C. J. L. (2012). Disentangling the Effects of Risk Factors and Clinical Care on Subnational Variation in Early Neonatal Mortality in the United States. PLoS ONE, 7(11). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049399

Readers over time

‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 16

67%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

13%

Researcher 3

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 20

69%

Nursing and Health Professions 5

17%

Social Sciences 3

10%

Decision Sciences 1

3%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0