COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and acceptance: A comprehensive scoping review of global literature

39Citations
Citations of this article
87Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

As countries continue the third year of the pandemic, we believe that there has been unfair attention to COVID-19 vaccine efficacy and safety, while tacitly ignoring serious challenges with vaccine uptake, without which vaccination may not be effective against the spread of COVID-19. While several studies have been published on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, there remains a need to conduct a comprehensive global analysis of vaccine hesitancy. We conducted a scoping review of 60 studies published globally on vaccine hesitancy and acceptance. We conducted a qualitative analysis to identify motivators and barriers to vaccination across several cultural and demographic contexts. We found the following factors to be relevant in any discussion about addressing or minimizing vaccine hesitancy: risk perceptions, trust in health care systems, solidarity, previous experiences with vaccines, misinformation, concerns about vaccine side effects and political ideology. We combine our insights from this comprehensive review of global literature to offer an important and practical discussion about two strategies that have been used to improve vaccine uptake: (i) communication and education and (ii) vaccine rollout and logistics.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Majid, U., Ahmad, M., Zain, S., Akande, A., & Ikhlaq, F. (2022). COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and acceptance: A comprehensive scoping review of global literature. Health Promotion International, 37(3). https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daac078

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free