Scientific Integrity Principles and Best Practices: Recommendations from a Scientific Integrity Consortium

93Citations
Citations of this article
388Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A Scientific Integrity Consortium developed a set of recommended principles and best practices that can be used broadly across scientific disciplines as a mechanism for consensus on scientific integrity standards and to better equip scientists to operate in a rapidly changing research environment. The two principles that represent the umbrella under which scientific processes should operate are as follows: (1) Foster a culture of integrity in the scientific process. (2) Evidence-based policy interests may have legitimate roles to play in influencing aspects of the research process, but those roles should not interfere with scientific integrity. The nine best practices for instilling scientific integrity in the implementation of these two overarching principles are (1) Require universal training in robust scientific methods, in the use of appropriate experimental design and statistics, and in responsible research practices for scientists at all levels, with the training content regularly updated and presented by qualified scientists. (2) Strengthen scientific integrity oversight and processes throughout the research continuum with a focus on training in ethics and conduct. (3) Encourage reproducibility of research through transparency. (4) Strive to establish open science as the standard operating procedure throughout the scientific enterprise. (5) Develop and implement educational tools to teach communication skills that uphold scientific integrity. (6) Strive to identify ways to further strengthen the peer review process. (7) Encourage scientific journals to publish unanticipated findings that meet standards of quality and scientific integrity. (8) Seek harmonization and implementation among journals of rapid, consistent, and transparent processes for correction and/or retraction of published papers. (9) Design rigorous and comprehensive evaluation criteria that recognize and reward the highest standards of integrity in scientific research.

References Powered by Scopus

A manifesto for reproducible science

1966Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling

1458Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science

865Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The Hong Kong principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity

221Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

COVID-19 research: pandemic versus “paperdemic”, integrity, values and risks of the “speed science”

90Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Socio-technical scales in socio-environmental modeling: Managing a system-of-systems modeling approach

56Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kretser, A., Murphy, D., Bertuzzi, S., Abraham, T., Allison, D. B., Boor, K. J., … Yada, R. (2019). Scientific Integrity Principles and Best Practices: Recommendations from a Scientific Integrity Consortium. Science and Engineering Ethics, 25(2), 327–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00094-3

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 95

58%

Researcher 33

20%

Lecturer / Post doc 19

12%

Professor / Associate Prof. 17

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27

27%

Medicine and Dentistry 27

27%

Social Sciences 26

26%

Nursing and Health Professions 20

20%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 2
News Mentions: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 89

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free