Proportionality: Challenging the critics

97Citations
Citations of this article
86Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

While the principle of proportionality has been the most important doctrinal tool in constitutional rights law around the world for decades, constitutional theorists have only recently begun to develop theoretical accounts of it. Even more recently, a few scholars have come forward with critiques of the doctrine's usefulness, in particular with regard to its assumed failure to adequately address the moral issues and the assumed impossibility or impressionistic nature of balancing. This paper examines the arguments of the critics and concludes that they have failed to make a convincing case against proportionality. © The Author 2012. Oxford University Press and New York University School of Law. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Möller, K. (2012). Proportionality: Challenging the critics. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 10(3), 709–731. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mos024

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free