Active prey rejection in the filter-feeding appendicularian Oikopleura dioica

33Citations
Citations of this article
53Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We describe different modes of prey rejection in a filter-feeding appendicularian, Oikopleura dioica. Nonselective prey rejection occurs by intermittent rejection through reversal of the feeding current of all particles when the pharyngeal filter is overloaded, AND by accidental loss through the spiracles of all particles that have entered the house when the pharyngeal filter occasionally breaks. In addition, selective prey rejection of individual particles may occur in the mouth by reversal of the ciliary current in the spiracle: the unwanted particle is expelled with a small amount of water. Up to four rejections of individual particles may occur per second. This active rejection is based on both the size and the chemical characteristics of the individual particle. A significantly higher rejection rate was found for toxic dinoflagelate (68%) compared to similar sized nontoxic ones (34%); exponentially growing algae were less rejected than senescent ones; and nutrient-depleted algae were more rejected than nutrient-replete cells. For nontoxic particles, prey size relative to the size of the appendicularian was the main prey selection criterion and the optimal prey size (> 80% acceptance) for O. dioica is between 0.4% and 2% of their own size, whereas the minimum and maximum particle sizes that they can ingest range from 0.04% to 20% of their own size. This prey size spectrum is much broader than that found in most other planktivorous organisms and demonstrates that appendicularians are simultaneous microphageous and macrophageous planktonic grazers. © 2011, by the American Society of Limnology and Oceanography, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lombard, F., Selander, E., & Kiørboe, T. (2011). Active prey rejection in the filter-feeding appendicularian Oikopleura dioica. Limnology and Oceanography, 56(4), 1504–1512. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2011.56.4.1504

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free