Let warnings interrupt the interaction and explain: designing and evaluating phishing email warnings

10Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Phishing represents one of the most spread and effective cyber-attacks of our times. Warning messages are commonly employed in email clients to notify users about the possible danger and let them decide on their own. However, the high success rate of phishing attacks shows that the existing warnings are not yet adequate. This study contributes by proposing two novel warning dialogs for email clients that prevent users from immediately accessing the content of phishing emails. Specifically, the first one alerts the users against the potential scam, and the second one also reports explanations about the possible causes of the scam. A comparative between-subjects experiment with 300 participants has been performed. Results show that the proposed warnings better defend users from phishing emails than the warnings at the state-of-the-art. In addition, explanations resulted useful in preventing users from discarding genuine emails where warnings are displayed incorrectly due to misclassification of the email.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Buono, P., Desolda, G., Greco, F., & Piccinno, A. (2023). Let warnings interrupt the interaction and explain: designing and evaluating phishing email warnings. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544549.3585802

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free